Opinion

in Re John-Baptist Sekumade Sekumade-Osime PLLC.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Mar 8, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued March 8, 2012.

In The

Court of

Appeals

For The

First District

of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00120-CV

———————————

IN RE JOHN-BAPTIST SEKUMADEAND SEKUMADE-OSIME PLLC, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION [1]

By petition

for writ of mandamus, relators John-Baptist Sekumade and Sekumade-Osime PLLC complain

that the trial judge abused her discretion by ordering them to pay monetary

sanction and holding them in contempt. We deny the petition for writ of

mandamus.

Per Curiam

Panel

consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

[1] Relator identifies the underlying

case as Erik Davis v. The Sekumade Law

Firm and John-Baptist Sekumade , Cause No. 2011-16071 in the 295th District

Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Caroline Baker presiding.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.