Opinion

Lajuan Cecile Bailey v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Apr 12, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.2%

“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”

How later courts described this case

  • “A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion issued April

12, 2012.

In

The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of

Texas

NO. 01-12-00199-CR

____________

LAJUAN CECILE BAILEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th

District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1212467

MEMORANDUM

OPINION

Appellant,

Lajuan Cecile Bailey, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of fraudulent use of

identifying information, pursuant to an agreed punishment recommendation of

confinement for two years. The trial

court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s

plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for two

years. Appellant filed a notice of

appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant

may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and

ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex.

R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal

must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right

of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification

is included in the record on appeal. See

id . The trial court’s certification

states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(a)(2). The record supports the

trial court’s certification. See Dears v.

State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we

must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to

ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by

Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action,

regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdiction. All pending

motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley

and Brown.

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2( b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.