Opinion

John-Baptist Sekumade v. Erik Davis

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jun 14, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued June 14, 2012.

In The

Court of

Appeals

For The

First District

of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00137-CV

———————————

JOHN-BAPTIST

SEKUMADE, Appellant

V.

ERIK DAVIS, Appellee

On

Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris

County, Texas

Trial

Court Cause No. 2011-16071

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, John-Baptist Sekumade, has neither

established indigence nor paid all the required fees. See Tex.

R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent),

20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (West

Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2011) (listing fees

in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the

Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in Tex. R. App. P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was

subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See Tex.

R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing

involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment

of all required fees.

We dismiss any pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel

consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.