Opinion

Tonya Credit and All Other Occupants v. Atascocita Pines Apartments

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jul 5, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued July 5, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-12-00172-CV

____________

TONYA CREDIT, Appellant

V.

ATASCOSITA PINES APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1002770

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from judgment of forcible detainer ordering the

eviction of appellant, Tonya Credit, from the premises of appellee, Atascosita Pines

Apartments. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely filed.

Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is

signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). The deadline to file a notice of appeal is

extended to 90 days after the date the judgment is signed if any party timely files a

motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under

certain circumstances, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id. To

be considered timely, a motion for new trial must be filed within 30 days after the

judgment is signed. TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a).

Here, the trial court signed the final judgment on December 1, 2011. The

record shows that appellant filed a “Notice of Hearing” on a motion for new trial.

The record does not reflect that a motion for new trial was filed or that a hearing

was held.

Because a motion for new trial was not filed, appellant’s notice of appeal

remained due by December 31, 2011. Appellant did not file her notice of appeal

until February 13, 2012. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed,

this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1.

On March 28, 2012, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction on the basis that appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely because

appellant failed to file a motion for new trial. Appellant did not respond.

2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.