The opinion
Opinion issued September 20, 2012
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-00669-CV
———————————
DAVID MARTIN HAYNES, Appellant
V.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS o/b/o SETHA RENE STEVENS,
Appellee
On Appeal from the 300th District Court
Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 65680
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, David Martin Haynes, has neither paid the required filing fee for
this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs
must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required
by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing
indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), §
51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of
appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and
the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app.
A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). Appellant was notified on July 26, 2012
that this appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not pay the fee by August 6,
2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did
not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule);
42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant was again notified on
August 10, 2012 that this appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not pay the fee
by August 20, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal,
appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.
2