Opinion

Tyrone Davis v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Oct 18, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.1%

The opinion

Opinion issued October 18, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00528-CR

NO. 01-12-00714-CR

———————————

TYRONE DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1245051 & 1245052

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Tyrone Davis, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of indecency

with a child by contact1 in trial court cause 1245052 and the felony offense of

1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11(a)(1) (West 2011).

aggravated sexual assault of a child2 in trial court cause 1245051. The trial court

found appellant guilty of each charge and, in accordance with the terms of

appellant’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for

ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeals.

In a plea-bargained case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that

were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the

trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West

2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification

showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the

record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certifications are included in the records on appeal.

See id. The trial court’s certifications state that these are plea-bargained cases and

the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The records

support the trial court’s certifications. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must

dismiss these appeals. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must

2

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(1)(B)(ii), (a)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2012).

2

dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the

appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss

all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.