Opinion

Ronald Lucero v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Mar 21, 2013
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-01010-CR

Style: Ronald Lucero

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: March 14, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to stay the issuance of the mandate

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to

extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

According to Lucero’s motion, he has not yet filed a petition for discretionary review;

any order on the motion would therefore be premature. Further, because this is not an

accelerated appeal, our mandate will not issue until after the Court of Criminal Appeals

resolves any timely-filed petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1, 18.6.

Judge's signature:/s/ Harvey Brown

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 21, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.