The opinion
Opinion issued July 2, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-13-00503-CR
———————————
IN RE PEDRO LUCIO, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Pedro Lucio, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus.1 Relator
does not specify the order from which he seeks relief, but instead claims that he is
1
Relator identifies the underlying case as cause number CR-03-028, from the 22nd
District Court of Hays County, Texas, and the Respondent as the State of Texas.
His conviction was affirmed by the Third Court of Appeals in Lucio v. State, No.
03-03-00448-CR, 2005 WL 607698, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 17, 2005, pet.
ref’d) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication).
“unlawfully restrained and confined” on his conviction for attempted sexual
assault.2
This Court lacks jurisdiction over this case arising out of a county not within
our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(b) (Vernon Supp. 2012).
Conclusion
We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2
See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011 (Vernon 2011).
2