Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph R. Zawadzki D/B/A Marla Security Service

  • 479 F.2d 1141
  • 72 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 14,098
  • 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9600
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Jun 5, 1973
Status
Published
On the bench
Celebrezze, Peck, Lively
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 48.9%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be considered on Petitioner’s application for the summary entry of judgment enforcing its Order of January 14, 1972 against Respondent, adopting with modification the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner’s decision and ordering appropriate relief thereunder. Respondent has filed no response to this application.

Upon review of the record filed with this Court by Petitioner it appears that Respondent failed to file timely objections to the Trial Examiner’s decision, as required under Section 10(c) of the Act and under Sections 102.46 and 102.48 of the Rules and Regulations of the National Labor Relations Board, Series 8. Respondent has failed to show this Court any extraordinary circumstances which might excuse this failure, and it is therefore precluded under Section 10 (c) of the Act from raising any objections to Petitioner’s Order before this Court.

It is therefore ordered that said application for summary entry of judgment enforcing Petitioner’s Order be and the same is hereby granted and that said Order be and the same is hereby enforced.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.