Opinion

Curtis Lee Johnson v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Apr 8, 2014
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Curtis Lee Johnson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00352-CR

Trial court case number: 1178448

Trial court: 208th District Court of Harris County

This case has previously been abated for a determination as to whether appointed counsel

has abandoned this appeal. On November 7, 2013, this Court reinstated this appeal and ordered

counsel for appellant to either re-file an Anders brief which is compliant with our court rules (the

Anders brief he attempted to file in February, 2013 was rejected by this Court for failure to

comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and counsel has been adequately notified

as such on several occasions), or to file appellant’s brief. No brief was filed. Most recently, on

March 18, 2014, this Court ordered counsel for Johnson to file either a compliant Anders brief or

appellant’s brief within 10 days or we will abate the appeal again.

We still are not in receipt of a compliant brief, whether in the form of a Motion to

Withdraw and accompanying Anders brief, or an appellant’s brief in accordance with Tex. R.

App. P. 38.1.

As such, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on or

before May 5, 2014, at which appellant and appointed appellate counsel, Gary Polland, shall be

present in person. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a date for said hearing and

notify the parties, including appellant. If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by

closed video teleconference.1 We direct the trial court to make appropriate written findings of

fact and conclusions of law and to execute any necessary orders on these issues:

1) Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;

2) Whether or not appointed counsel, Gary Polland, has abandoned this appeal and

whether or not to allow him to withdraw;

1 Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a

simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between

the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and

his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the

attorney representing the State.

3) Whether appellant is now indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and, if

indigent,

a. appoint counsel on appeal, and

b. order the court reporter to file the reporter’s record with this Court at no

cost to appellant;

4) If appellant is not indigent:

a. whether he has retained an attorney to file a brief, and, if so, obtain the

name, address, and telephone number of retained counsel;

b. if appellant has not retained counsel, the trial court shall admonish

appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, and

i. determine whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently

waiving his right to counsel; or,

ii. if appellant does not wish to proceed pro se, provide a deadline by

which appellant must hire an attorney.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (f); Oliver, 872 S.W.2d at 716; Minjares, 577

S.W.2d at 224; cf. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(g).

The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file

the reporter’s record with the Court no later than 35 days from the date of this order.

Additionally, the trial court’s findings and recommendations and any orders issued pursuant to

this hearing shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later

than 35 days from the date of this order. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a

certified electronic copy of the hearing shall be filed in this Court no later than 35 days from the

date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental

clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 8, 2014

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.