Opinion

Rudy Matamoros, Jr. v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Apr 15, 2014
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Order filed April 15, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-13-00633-CR

RUDY MATAMOROS, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 8

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1863073

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 23, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P.

35.1. On October 31, 2013, this court ordered Sondra Humphrey, the court reporter, to

file the record within 30 days. On November 19, 2013, Humphrey filed a motion for

extension of time to file the record which was granted until January 15, 2014. On

January 16, 2014, Humphrey filed a second motion for extension of time which was

granted until February 14, 2014, with no further extensions. On February 25, 2014,

Humphrey filed a third motion for extension of time to file the record which was granted

in part and denied in part with the record due on or before March 17, 2014. The record

has not been filed with the court.

In cause number 01-13-00227-CR, Washington v. State, this Court ordered

Humphrey to appear and show cause as to why she had not filed the reporter’s record in

this court. Humphrey failed to appear as noticed. Humphrey has also failed to file

reporter records in cause numbers 01-13-00632-CR, Castillos v. State, 01-13-00896-CR,

Bankett v. State, and 01-13-01048-CR, Acosta v. State.

The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the

appellate record is timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s

record has not been filed timely as ordered in this cause and because Humphrey is

delinquent on the matters listed above, we issue the following order.

We direct the judge of the County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 to conduct a

hearing at which Sondra Humphrey, a court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and

appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the

record; (b) to establish a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to

make findings as to whether Sondra Humphrey should be held in contempt of court for

failing to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a

record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings

of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record

and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days

of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s

findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate

the appeal on its own motion. If Humphrey files the record prior to the date set for the

hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.