Opinion

Craig Lynn Beal v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
May 6, 2014
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Order filed May 6, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-12-00896-CR

CRAIG LYNN BEAL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No 8

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 1793757

ORDER OF CONTINUING ABATEMENT

This case was abated on October 29, 2013 for a hearing on indigence and

appointment of counsel. The trial court held the abatement hearing on November 11,

2013, and the clerk of the trial court has filed a supplemental record containing

handwritten notes from that hearing. The court reporter’s record of that hearing was due

on November 29, 2013, and has not been filed. Therefore, we are not in receipt of a

record reflecting proper admonishments have been provided to Beal about the dangers of

proceeding pro se in accordance with our order of October 29, 2013.

In cause number 01-13-00227-CR, Washington v. State, this Court ordered

Sondra Humphrey to appear and show cause as to why she had not filed the reporter’s

record in this court. On March 26, 2014, Humphrey failed to appear as noticed.

Humphrey has also failed to file reporter records in cause numbers 01-13-00633-CR,

Matamoros v. State, 01-13-00896-CR, Bankett v. State, and 01-13-01048-CR, Acosta v.

State.

The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate

record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record of the

November 11, 2013 abatement hearing has not been filed timely as ordered in this cause

and because Humphrey is delinquent on the matters listed above, we issue the following

order.

We direct the judge of the County Criminal Court at Law No 8 to conduct a

hearing at which Sondra Humphrey, a court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and

appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the

record; (b) to establish a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to

make findings as to whether Sondra Humphrey should be held in contempt of court for

failing to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a

record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings

of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record

and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days

of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s

findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate

the appeal on its own motion. If Humphrey files the record prior to the date set for the

hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.