Opinion

Curtis Lee Johnson v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jul 31, 2014
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.8%

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Curtis Lee Johnson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00352-CR

Trial court case number: 1178448

Trial court: 208th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s counsel in this case has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief stating there

are no arguable grounds for appeal, based on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Appellant has a right to respond to counsel’s motion. Pursuant to Kelly v. State, No. PD-

0702-13, 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014), we direct the Clerk of this Court

to send, at no cost to appellant, a complete copy of the appellate record so that appellant may

respond to the Anders brief.

Appellant has 30 days from the date of this order to file a pro se response, if any, to the

Anders brief and motion to withdraw filed by appellate counsel. The Anders brief in this appeal

is included as an exhibit to the reporter’s record of the abatement hearing held May 5, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 31, 2014

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.