Opinion

Cody Crymes v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Sep 24, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.0%

“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”

How later courts described this case

  • “A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion issued September 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-15-00206-CR

———————————

CODY CRYMES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Chambers County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 17166

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Cody Crymes, pled guilty to the felony offense of sexual assault of a

child. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of

appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to ten years

deferred adjudication and imposed a fine of $1,500.00. Appellant filed a notice of

appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The

trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has

no right of appeal. See id. at 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s

certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because

appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183

S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction

to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule

25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis

for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.