“[P]etitioner’s failure to seek a pre-election review of the Board’s unit placement determination precludes judicial review of that determination.”
How later courts described this case
- “[P]etitioner’s failure to seek a pre-election review of the Board’s unit placement determination precludes judicial review of that determination.”
- “failure to seek a preelection review of the Board’s unit placement determination precludes judicial review of that determination”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ORDER
This appeal presents a petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board ( 189 NLRB No. 102 ) and a cross-application of the Board for enforcement of that order. On its merits the appeal would present an issue as to whether petitioner had refused to bargain with a union certified by the Board as representative of its employees, but on consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs,of the parties and the oral arguments of counsel, the Court concludes that petitioner’s failure to seek a pre-election review of the Board’s unit placement determination precludes judicial review of that determination. N.L.R.B. v. Rod-Ric Corp., 428 F.2d 948, 950 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 937 , 91 S.Ct. 922 , 28 L.Ed.2d 216 ;
see
N.L.R.B. v. Richard W. Kaase Co., 346 F.2d 24, 28-29 (6th Cir. 1965). Accordingly,
It is ordered that the petition for review be and it hereby is denied, and enforcement of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board is hereby ordered.