Opinion

Terri B. Alexander v. Department of Agriculture

Court
Merit Systems Protection Board
Filed
Sep 25, 2015
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

TERRI B. ALEXANDER, DOCKET NUMBER

Appellant, DA-0351-11-0285-X-1

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, DATE: September 25, 2015

Agency.

THIS FINAL ORDER IS NONPRECEDENTIAL *

Terrence J. Johns, New Orleans, Louisiana, for the appellant.

Cheri G. Alsobrook, Sandy S. Francois, and Thomas E. Dunn,

New Orleans, Louisiana, for the agency.

BEFORE

Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman

Mark A. Robbins, Member

FINAL ORDER

¶1 The administrative judge issued an October 11, 2012 compliance

recommendation granting the appellant’s petition for enforcement concerning the

March 21, 2012 initial decision that reversed the agency’s action. Initial Appeal

File, Tab 31, Initial Decision; Compliance File, Tab 3, Compliance

*

A nonprecedential order is one that the Board has determined does not add

significantly to the body of MSPB case law. Parties may cite nonprecedential orders,

but such orders have no precedential value; the Board and administrative judges are not

required to follow or distinguish them in any future decisions. In contrast, a

precedential decision issued as an Opinion and Order has been identified by the Board

as significantly contributing to the Board’s case law. See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.117(c).

2

Recommendation. Thereafter, the parties filed a joint stipulation and settlement

signed and dated by the appellant on May 20, 2015, and by the agency on

May 21, 2015, indicating that all matters raised in the referenced enforcement

action now have been resolved to the parties’ mutual understanding, and they

request that the enforcement action be dismissed with prejudice to refiling.

Compliance Referral File, Tab 31.

¶2 Finding that dismissal is appropriate under these circumstances, we

DISMISS the petition for enforcement as settled with prejudice to refiling. This

is the Board’s final decision in this matter. Title 5 of the Code of Federal

Regulations, section 1201.113 (5 C.F.R. § 1201.113).

NOTICE TO THE APPELLANT REGARDING

YOUR FURTHER REVIEW RIGHTS

You have the right to request further review of this final decision.

Discrimination Claims: Administrative Review

You may request review of this final decision on your discrimination

claims by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). See Title 5

of the United States Code, section 7702(b)(1) (5 U.S.C. § 7702(b)(1)). If you

submit your request by regular U.S. mail, the address of the EEOC is:

Office of Federal Operations

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, D.C. 20013

If you submit your request via commercial delivery or by a method

requiring a signature, it must be addressed to:

Office of Federal Operations

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

131 M Street, NE

Suite 5SW12G

Washington, D.C. 20507

3

You should send your request to EEOC no later than 30 calendar days after

your receipt of this order. If you have a representative in this case, and your

representative receives this order before you do, then you must file with EEOC no

later than 30 calendar days after receipt by your representative. If you choose to

file, be very careful to file on time.

Discrimination and Other Claims: Judicial Action

If you do not request EEOC to review this final decision on your

discrimination claims, you may file a civil action against the agency on both your

discrimination claims and your other claims in an appropriate United States

district court. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2). You must file your civil action with

the district court no later than 30 calendar days after your receipt of this order. If

you have a representative in this case, and your representative receives this order

before you do, then you must file with the district court no later than 30 calendar

days after receipt by your representative. If you choose to file, be very careful to

file on time. If the action involves a claim of discrimination based on race, color,

religion, sex, national origin, or a disabling condition, you may be entitled to

representation by a court-appointed lawyer and to waiver of any requirement of

prepayment of fees, costs, or other security. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) and

29 U.S.C. § 794a.

FOR THE BOARD: ______________________________

William D. Spencer

Clerk of the Board

Washington, D.C.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.