Opinion

William K. Green v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Sep 22, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: William K. Green v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00960-CR

Trial court case number: 717215

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

On April 28, 2015, this Court issued an order, in which we stated the trial court had given

appellant 30 days to hire counsel, and because no attorney had made an appearance on behalf of

appellant, we would consider appellant to be pro se. We ordered appellant to file his brief by

May 28, 2015.

The time for appellant to file his brief has passed and no response has been made to our

order of April 28th order. When an appellant in a criminal case fails to file a brief, Rule

38.8(b)(4) requires the appellate court to issue an order, directing the trial court to hold a hearing

and make certain findings. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.3(b)(2)-(3). If the trial court finds that appellant

no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, or that appellant is not indigent, but has not made the

necessary arrangements for filing a brief, the appellant court may consider the appeal without

briefs. Id. at 38.8(b)(4).

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at

which appellant and retained counsel, if any, shall be present in person. 1 The court coordinator

of the trial court shall set a date for said hearing and notify the parties, including appellant. We

direct the trial court to make appropriate written findings of fact and conclusions of law and to

execute any necessary orders on these issues:

1) Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;

2) If so, whether appellant has retained counsel;

1 If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference. Any such teleconference

must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full

motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any

attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to

communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the

State.

3) To set a date certain (in no event to be more than 30 days from the date of the

abatement hearing) for appellant to file a brief;

4) Whether appellant is now indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and, if

indigent,

a. appoint counsel on appeal, and

b. order the court reporter to file the reporter’s record with this Court at no

cost to appellant; or

5) If appellant is not indigent:

a. whether he has retained an attorney to file a brief, and, if so, obtain the

name, address, and telephone number of retained counsel; or

b. if appellant has not retained counsel, the trial court shall admonish

appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, and

i. determine whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently

waiving his right to counsel; or,

ii. if appellant does not wish to proceed pro se, provide a deadline by

which appellant must hire an attorney.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (f); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).

The trial court’s findings and recommendations (separate and apart from any docket sheet

notation) and any orders issued pursuant to this hearing shall be included in a supplemental

clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. The trial

court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’s

record with the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Additionally, If the

hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified electronic copy of the hearing shall be

filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental

clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 22, 2015

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.