Opinion

Joyce Brown v. Michael Hale

  • 506 F. App'x 342
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Nov 20, 2012
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
McKeague, Griffin, Dlott
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 12a1204n.06

No. 12-5617 FILED

Nov 20, 2012

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JOYCE BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

) ON APPEAL FROM THE

v. ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT

) COURT FOR THE MIDDLE

MICHAEL HALE, et al., ) DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

)

Defendants-Appellees. ) OPINION

BEFORE: McKEAGUE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and DLOTT, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Joyce Brown appeals the district court’s award of summary

judgment to defendant law enforcement officers on her civil rights and tort claims stemming from

two encounters in August and December 2009. Having duly considered the district court’s opinion

and the record in light of the parties’ appellate briefing, we find that plaintiff has not raised any

argument that is not fairly and properly addressed in the district court’s opinion. Although we

review the district court’s ruling de novo, we find no error. Concluding that a separate opinion

would be duplicative and unnecessary, we hereby AFFIRM the district court’s summary judgment

ruling on the reasoning of its opinion.

*

Honorable Susan J. Dlott, Chief United States District Judge for the Southern District of

Ohio, sitting by designation.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.