The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2115
JONATHAN BOLLS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00427-HEH)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Bolls, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint challenging the constitutionality of
the Appellee’s rules governing release of a failed applicant’s
essay examination. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar
Examiners, No. 3:11-cv-00427-HEH (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2