Opinion

The May Department Stores Company v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 440 F.2d 993
  • 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2255
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10687
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Apr 16, 1971
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

440 F.2d 993

77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2255 , 65 Lab.Cas. P 11,699

The MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, d/b/a O'Neil Company, Petitioner,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Retail Clerks

International Association, Local 698, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.

No. 20745.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 16, 1971.

Kenneth R. Millisor, Akron, Ohio, E. G. Kemp, Wise, Roetzel, Maxon, Kelly & Andress, Akron, Ohio, for petitioner.

Patricia Whorthy, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief, for respondent.

Before MILLER and KENT, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit judge.

1

PER CURIAM ORDER.

2

This case is before the Court on a petition for review and a cross-petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board's decisions and order are reported at 184 N.L.R.B. No. 68.

3

This Court holds that there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's findings that the company interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees in the exercise of their rights under Section 7 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. 157, in violation of 8(a)(1).

4

It is ordered that the order of the Board be and is hereby enforced.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.