The opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00226-CR
Robert Troy McClure, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. CR2005-234-4, THE HONORABLE JACK ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Robert Troy McClure has filed a pro se notice of appeal of the trial court’s
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Recommendation and Order entered in response to
McClure’s fifth application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code
of Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 (procedure for application for writ of
habeas corpus).
Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony
convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 5;
Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481,
483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re Watson, 253 S.W.3d 319, 320 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, orig.
proceeding). The intermediate courts of appeals have no role in criminal law matters pertaining to
proceedings initiated under article 11.07. See In re Briscoe, 20 S.W.3d 196 (Tex. App.—Houston
[14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st
Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding); cf. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115,
117–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: June 13, 2013
Do Not Publish
2