Opinion

Brown, Kimberly Gore

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Apr 10, 2013
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.3%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-79,183-01 & -02

EX PARTE KIMBERLY GORE BROWN, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 19331 & 19333 IN THE 88TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARDIN COUNTY

Per curiam .

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts

of intoxication manslaughter and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment on each count. She did

not appeal her convictions.

Applicant contends that trial counsel told her that she would become eligible for parole when

her time served plus her good time equaled one-half of her sentences. In fact, she will become

eligible after serving one-half of her sentences without consideration of good time. Tex. Gov't

Code § 508.145(d)(1); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12, §3g(a)(2).

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. Strickland v. Washington ,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Moussazadeh , 361 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. The trial court may use any means set out

in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If she is not and the trial court elects to

hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes

to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent her at the hearing.

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel's

advice on parole eligibility was deficient and, if so, whether Applicant would have pleaded not guilty

but for this advice. Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985). The trial court shall also make any other

findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of

Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 10, 2013

Do not publish

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.