Opinion

Ratliff, Kenneth Neal

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Aug 24, 2011
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.3%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-75,390-01

EX PARTE KENNETH NEAL RATLIFF, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 13735-A IN THE 29 TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM PALO PINTO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault on a

public servant and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. After appellate counsel filed an Anders

brief, the Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ratliff v. State , No. 11-08-00231-CR

(Tex. App.-Eastland, January 22, 2009).

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by his failure to

investigate an invalid enhancement, and by eliciting prior conviction testimony from Applicant

which had been ruled inadmissible for impeachment purposes prior to trial. He also alleges that

appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise trial court error for denying a requested

instruction for a lesser included offense.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington ,

466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke , 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall obtain a response from Applicant's trial and appellate counsels regarding Applicant's claims

of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings as to whether Brown County cause number 12,503 was

used as an enhancement of the instant sentence and if so, whether Applicant's initial sentence of

community supervision had been revoked prior to the current sentence being imposed. The trial

court shall make findings as to whether trial counsel had a strategic reason to question Applicant

about all of his prior convictions, and whether Applicant was harmed by those questions from

counsel. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's

trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant.

The trial court shall make findings as to whether trial counsel requested a lesser included offense

instruction, whether the evidence supported the giving of such an instruction, and if so, whether

Applicant suffered some harm by the failing of the trial court to give such an instruction. The trial

court shall also make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's appellate counsel

was deficient, and if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial

court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and

appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the

order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 24, 2011

Do not publish

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.