Opinion

Sliger, Billy Aaron

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
May 6, 2009
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.2%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR- 71,904-01

EX PARTE BILLY AARON SLIGER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR17102 IN THE 35 TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BROWN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). After a period of deferred adjudication

community supervision, Applicant was adjudicated guilty, convicted of aggravated sexual assault,

and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment.

Applicant contends, inter alia , that counsel at his original plea rendered ineffective assistance

by failing to investigate his mental history, allowing and encouraging him to make a plea deal for

deferred adjudication community supervision when he should have known Applicant would not have

been able to successfully complete the supervision due to his mental illness, and failing to discuss

a possible defense due to his mental illness, which was known to counsel.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington ,

466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke , 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of

ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection.

Id .

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether original counsel knew of Applicant's

mental health problems prior to the plea. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to what

investigation, if any, counsel did into any possible defenses based on Applicant's mental illness

history. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial

attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The

trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant

and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the

order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: May 6, 2009

Do not publish

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.