Opinion

Brown, Robert Eugene

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Oct 21, 2009
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.2%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-67,100-05

EX PARTE ROBERT EUGENE BROWN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-4-008863-1150019-A IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to 12 months' confinement. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant alleges that counsel showed "no interest in case" and only sought a plea bargain

agreement. Specifically, Applicant alleges that counsel failed to advice him of a plea offer for 7-months confinement which the State made before trial. Further, counsel failed to show up for a

scheduled court date.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington ,

466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke , 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d) to resolve the fact issues.

In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id . The trial court shall

order counsel to file an affidavit addressing: (1) whether counsel investigated the facts and law in

the case; (2) whether counsel informed Applicant of the 7-month plea offer which the State made

pre-trial, and, (3) whether counsel came to all scheduled court appearances.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's

claim that counsel was ineffective. Specifically, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to

whether counsel investigated the facts and law in the case. The trial court shall also make findings

of facts as to whether counsel informed Applicant of the 7-month plea offer which the State made pre-trial. The trial court shall also make findings of fact as to whether counsel came to all scheduled court

appearances. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that

it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the

order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be

returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 21, 2009

Do not publish

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.