Opinion

Ware, Robert Dale

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Aug 30, 2006
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.1%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-12,094-08

EX PARTE ROBERT DALE WARE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM CAUSE NO. 18,121-A IN THE 30 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

WICHITA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court

by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Penal

Code. Ex Parte Young , 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted

of rape, and was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. Applicant's conviction was

affirmed on direct appeal. Ware v. State , 628 S.W.2d 249 (Tex. App. - Ft. Worth, delivered

February 10, 1982, pet. ref'd.)

Applicant contends that he has been denied time credit toward the expiration of his

sentence for time spent in confinement pursuant to a pre-revocation or blue warrant.

The trial court has not entered findings of fact or conclusions of law. Because we

believe that Applicant has stated facts requiring resolution, and because this Court cannot

hear evidence, it is necessary for the matter to be remanded to the trial court for resolution.

Applicant has alleged facts which, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Canada , 754

S.W.2d 660, 668 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Therefore, it is this Court's opinion that additional

facts need to be developed, and that because this Court cannot hear evidence, the trial court

is the appropriate forum.

The trial court shall resolve those issues as set out in Article 11.07, Section 3(d) of the

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, in that it shall order the Texas Board of Pardons and

Paroles and/or the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division to file an

affidavit addressing whether Applicant was in custody pursuant to a pre-revocation warrant

prior to the revocation of his supervised release on December 5, 2003. If a pre-revocation

warrant was issued prior to that date, the affidavit shall address the date any such warrant was

issued and executed. The affidavit shall also address whether Applicant received time credit

for the period of time he was in custody under any such pre-revocation or blue warrant. The

trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. In the appropriate case,

the trial court may rely on its personal recollection.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, the court shall first decide whether Applicant

is indigent. If the trial court finds that Applicant is indigent, and the Applicant desires to be

represented by counsel, the trial court will then, pursuant to the provisions of Article 26.04

of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.

Following the receipt of additional information, the trial court shall make findings of

fact as to whether Applicant was ever in custody pursuant to a pre-revocation or blue

warrant, and if so, whether Applicant received the correct amount of credit for the period of

time he spent in confinement. The trial court shall also make any further findings of fact and

conclusions of law which it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's

claim for habeas corpus relief.

Because this Court does not hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1960), this application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus will be held

in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. Resolution of the issue shall

be accomplished by the trial court within ninety days of the date of this order. (1) A

supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the

court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition along with the trial court's supplemental

findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within one hundred

and twenty days of the date of this order. (2)

DELIVERED: August 30, 2006

DO NOT PUBLISH

1.

1 In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the

continuance shall be provided to this Court.

2.

2 Any extensions of this time period shall be obtained from this Court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.