Opinion

United States of America, and v. Noel Brown, United States of America, and v. Sylvester Riley

  • 429 F.2d 983
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Sep 9, 1970
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.5%

The opinion

429 F. 2d 983

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Noel BROWN, Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Sylvester RILEY, Appellant.

Nos. 25618, 25643.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 9, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Warren J. Ferguson, Judge.

1

Carl E. Stewart, Los Angeles, Cal., for Brown.

2

Joseph T. Vodnoy, Los Angeles, Cal., for Riley.

3

Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Criminal Division, Brian J. O'Neill, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

4

Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

5

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

6

We find no illegally 'seized' evidence as a matter of law, no illegal search under the circumstances, and find adequate evidence to support the verdict.

7

On the first contention the court accepts United States v. Polansky, 418 F.2d 444 (2d Cir., 1969); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir., 1969); Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir., 1968); and Dryden v. United States, 391 F.2d 214 (5th Cir., 1968).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.