Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company

  • 420 F.2d 1383
  • 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2672
  • 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10388
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 9, 1970
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

420 F.2d 1383

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,

v.

QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 13705.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 4, 1970.

Decided March 9, 1970.

On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.

Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Upon consideration of the Board's application for enforcement of its order and after hearing oral argument, the court is of the view that the order is well supported by the record as a whole.

2

The order is hereby enforced.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.