Opinion

Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 415 F.2d 1007
  • 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2576
  • 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10469
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Oct 10, 1969
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.4%

The opinion

415 F.2d 1007

TRAILMOBILE DIVISION, PULLMAN INCORPORATED, Petitioner,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 25470.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

October 10, 1969.

Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas case).

Charles M. Lanier, New Orleans, La., Hulse Hays, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, Alan E. Harazin, Cincinnati, Ohio, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, for respondent.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Upon consideration of this cause en banc the Court concludes that the opinion and judgment of the majority of the panel be and the same is hereby affirmed, 5 Cir., 407 F.2d 1006 .

2

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, BELL, AINSWORTH, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.