Opinion

in Re Carlos A. Armenta

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Oct 23, 2009
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.3%

The opinion

Opinion issued October 23, 2009

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-09-00821-CR

____________

IN RE CARLOS A. ARMENTA, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this Court to

compel respondent to rule on a post-conviction motion that he claims to have filed in

trial court cause number 9402665 on June 17, 2009.

Relator pleaded guilty to the offense of murder. After a presentence

investigation hearing, the trial court sentenced relator to confinement for 40 years and

signed a final judgment in this case on December 8, 1995. No direct appeal was

taken. Therefore, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was January 7, 1996. The

trial court's judgment of conviction is final.

Relator contends in his petition that the conviction in cause number is void

because he was 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense and that

he was never certified to stand trial as an adult. (1)

Jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests

exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.

art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2008) ; Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth District , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App.

1995). The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas

courts is through a writ of habeas corpus. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07

(Vernon Supp. 2008); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.59 (Vernon Supp. 2008).

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Therefore, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of

jurisdiction.

We deny all pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley and Sharp.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

1.

See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 8.07 (Vernon 2008); Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

Ann. art. 11.59 (Vernon Supp. 2008). Ex Parte Billy Joe Waggoner , 61

S.W.3d 429 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.