Opinion

in Re Todd Warren Altschul

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jul 6, 2007
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.2%

The opinion

Opinion issued July 6, 2007

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-07-00439 - CR

____________

IN RE TODD WARREN ALTSCHUL, Relator

Original Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Todd Warren Altschul, petitions this Court for a post-conviction

writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp.

2004). This Court has no jurisdiction to hear a post-conviction application for writ

of habeas corpus in felony cases. Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court

of Appeals for the Eighth District , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).

In support of his petition, relator erroneously relies on Padilla v. McDaniel ,

122 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). However, the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals in Padilla held that when it and a court of appeals have concurrent original

jurisdiction of a petition for writ of mandamus against the judge of a district or county

court, the petition should be presented first to the court of appeals. Id . at 808. In this

proceeding, relator is not requesting mandamus relief, but habeas corpus relief.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus for

want of jurisdiction and deny all requested relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Jennings, and Alcala.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.