Opinion

Ex Parte Louis Means

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Feb 13, 2003
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.1%

The opinion

Opinion issued February 13, 2003

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-03-00094-CV

____________

IN RE LOUIS MEANS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Louis Means, requests that this Court compel respondent (1) to rule

on his petition for writ of habeas corpus in cause number 370813-B, filed pursuant

to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. Ann. Art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2003).

This Court has no authority to issue a writ of mandamus to compel a

district court judge to rule on a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which the

judgment of conviction is final. In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex.

App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). This is because jurisdiction to

grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests exclusively with the

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth District , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App.

1995); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2003).

Therefore, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of

jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED .

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Higley.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47. 2(b).

1.

Respondent is the Honorable Brian Rains, Judge, 176th District Court, Harris

County.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.