Opinion

in Re: Todd Altschul

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Dec 11, 2003
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.1%

The opinion

Opinion issued December 11, 2003

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NOS. 01-03-01230-CR

01-03-01231-CR

01-03-01232-CR

____________

IN RE TODD ALTSCHUL, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Todd Altschul, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in

this Court. He requests that we issue a writ ordering that the Honorable Ben Hardin,

Judge of the 23rd District Court in Brazoria County, “re-construct missing judgments

and indictments” in cause numbers 23557, 26672, and 26673. Relator further

requests that we remand the case to the trial court “to appoint counsel and hold

proceedings” under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

We are without jurisdiction to grant habeas corpus relief. The courts of

appeals have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. Dodson v.

State , 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Tex. Gov’t

Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2004). Moreover, we have no jurisdiction over

post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See Board of Pardons &

Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District , 910 S.W.2d 481,

483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon

Supp. 2004).

Even if we were to treat the application as a petition for writ of mandamus,

we would still have to deny relief because we do not have a record showing that

relator made any request of the trial court to perform a nondiscretionary act that the

trial court refused. See Barnes v. State , 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston

[1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, the petition is denied .

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hedges,

Alcala, and Hanks.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.