Opinion

Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

  • 2015 Ohio 3443
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 28, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.0%

The opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as

Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3443.]

NOTICE

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in

an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested

to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio,

65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or

other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be

made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2015-OHIO-3443

ROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.,

APPELLEES.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it

may be cited as Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion

No. 2015-Ohio-3443.]

Taxation—Real-property valuation—Board of Tax Appeals’ decision vacated and

cause remanded for consideration in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Bd. of Revision.

(No. 2013-1951—Submitted January 13, 2015—Decided August 28, 2015.)

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2013-607.

__________________

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) is vacated and

the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga

Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3431, which addressed a

property located in close proximity to the property at issue here and which held

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

that a recent, arm’s-length sale price of $5,000 was the value of the property. On

remand, the BTA shall consider the $5,000 value of the Schwartz property along

with all the other evidence currently in the record to determine the value of the

property at issue.

Decision vacated,

and cause remanded.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and O’NEILL, JJ.,

concur.

KENNEDY and FRENCH, JJ., dissent.

_________________

J. Alex Morton, for appellants.

Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Reno J.

Oradini Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

_________________

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.