Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Beverage-Air Company, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

  • 391 F.2d 255
  • 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2763
  • 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8041
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 15, 1968
Status
Published
On the bench
Boreman, Winter, Butzner
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 56.5%

granting § 10(e) relief when the “uncontroverted evidence establishes reasonable cause to believe the act has been violated and that the remedial purposes of the act will be frustrated unless relief pendente lite is granted”

How later courts described this case

  • granting § 10(e) relief when the “uncontroverted evidence establishes reasonable cause to believe the act has been violated and that the remedial purposes of the act will be frustrated unless relief pendente lite is granted”
  • § 10(e) injunction against enforcement by employer of no-solicitation rule granted

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the Labor Act [ 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e)], moved for enforcement of its order

pendente lite

requiring Beverage-Air Company to cease and desist from continuing to restrain and coerce its employees in the exercise of their rights guaranteed by § 7 of the act [ 29 U.S.C. § 157 ]. The uncontroverted evidence establishes reasonable cause to believe the act has been violated and that the remedial purposes of the act will be frustrated unless relief

pendente lite

is granted. NLRB v. Aerovox Corp., of Myrtle Beach, 389 F.2d 475 , 67 L.R.R.M. 2158 (4th Cir. 1967).

The Board’s motion will be granted to this extent: the respondent must cease and desist from enforcing a no solicitation rule in nonworking areas of the plant during nonworking time, and from continuing to discriminate against employees who are union supporters with respect to the terms and conditions of employment. The Board’s motion to require reinstatement of discharged employees

pendente lite

is denied. Counsel for the Board is directed to submit to the court a proposed order after furnishing a copy to counsel for the respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.