The opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00026-CV
In re Charles A. Malouff, Jr.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Charles A. Malouff, Jr., an inmate appearing pro se, has filed an original application
for writ of habeas corpus in this Court, relating to his 2013 conviction for securing a document by
deception, a felony. Malouff is serving a 15-year sentence as a result of his conviction. Malouff
sought habeas relief in federal court, but, according to Malouff, his application was dismissed
without prejudice by the federal court to allow him to pursue habeas relief in state court. In this
proceeding, Malouff asks the Court to grant his writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, vacate his conviction, and remand his case for a new trial.
We do not have jurisdiction over Malouff’s request. This Court’s original jurisdiction
to issue a writ of habeas corpus is limited to those cases in which a person’s liberty is restrained
because the person has violated an order, judgment, or decree entered in a civil case. See Tex. Gov’t
Code § 22.221(d). Moreover, article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure vests complete
jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 5; Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court
of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Ex parte Williams,
239 S.W.3d 859, 862 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.). The intermediate courts of appeals have
no jurisdiction in criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings initiated under article 11.07.
Ex parte Garcia, No. 03-14-00292-CR, 2014 WL 3893030, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 8, 2014,
orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196
(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we dismiss this original proceeding for want of jurisdiction.
_______________________________________
Scott K. Field, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field
Filed: January 23, 2015
2