Opinion

Orlando Brown v. South Carolina, State of

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 20, 2015
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2155

ORLANDO IRA BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior

District Judge. (3:13-cv-02983-MBS)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and

dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint

against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C.

Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.