Opinion

Tambria Lee v. Daniel Leon Peterson and Morgan Peterson, Jr.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Nov 18, 2014
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued November 18, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-14-00646-CV

———————————

TAMBRIA LEE, Appellant

V.

DANIEL LEON PETERSON AND MORGAN PETERSON, JR., Appellees

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 53927

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Tambria Lee, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding

Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and

1

Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138

(Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). Further,

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the

clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal

was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5; 42.3(b).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.