Opinion

OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE

  • 2014 OK 91
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Nov 4, 2014
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 33.5%

The opinion

OSCN Found Document:OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE

OSCN navigation

Home

Courts

Court Dockets

Legal Research

Calendar

Help

Previous Case

Top Of Index

This Point in Index

Citationize

Next Case

Print Only

OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE

2014 OK 91

Case Number: 113355

Decided: 11/04/2014

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Cite as: 2014 OK 91 , __ P.3d __

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, on behalf of itself and its members, and Nova Health Systems, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its members, Appellants,

v.

Terry L. Cline, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health, and Lyle Kelsey, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

¶1 This opinion addresses only the trial court's denial of a temporary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of House Bill 2684, 2014 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 121 (effective November 1, 2014) (Act). Appellant's constitutional challenge to the enactment remains pending in the trial court. Upon consideration of "Appellant's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Injunction or, in the Alternative, an Emergency Stay of the District Court's Order to Preserve the Status Quo ", and pursuant to the authority provided by Article 7, section 4, of the Oklahoma Constitution, this Court temporarily enjoins enforcement of the Act until the constitutionality of the Act is fully and finally litigated.

¶2 This matter is remanded to the trial court for determination of the constitutional challenge to the Act to be memorialized by findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court expresses no opinion concerning the validity of the Act.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR

Citationizer © Summary of Documents Citing This Document

Cite

Name

Level

None Found.

Citationizer: Table of Authority

Cite

Name

Level

None Found.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.