The opinion
Opinion issued September 23, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-14-00576-CR
———————————
CHUCK HARPER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 351st District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1064870
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 23, 2006, appellant Chuck Lepold Harper was convicted of robbery
with bodily injury and sentenced to 99 years imprisonment (Trial Ct. Cause No.
1064870) with the sentence to “run cumulative to cause no. 473251, a 45 yrs TDC
sentence for robbery dated 9/2/87, in the 177th Court.” Harper appealed his
conviction and we issued an opinion affirming the conviction on June 21, 2007.
See Harper v. State, No. 01-06-00495-CR, 2007 WL 1775982 (Tex. App.—
Houston [1st Dist.] June 21, 2007, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for
publication). The Court of Criminal Appeals refused Harper’s petition for
discretionary review on October 31, 2007, and our mandate issued on February 26,
2008.
On January 28, 2013, Harper filed a “Motion to Correct Sentence” with the
trial court, arguing that the stacking of his sentences was improper.* Harper alleges
that he received the 45-year sentence in Cause No. 473251 in 1986, was paroled on
March 3, 2004, and was on parole at the time of his offense in Cause No. 106487.
Harper claims that the trial court’s granting of the State’s motion to cumulate
improperly makes him redo his 45-year sentence and that his sentence should only
be the 99 years assessed in Cause No. 1064870. The trial court denied Harper’s
motion on May 16, 2014. Harper filed a notice of appeal on June 5, 2014.
The relief sought by Harper can only be granted by a post-conviction writ of
habeas corpus. Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant
such relief in final post-conviction felony proceedings, which are governed by
*
On July 31, 2013, Harper filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we
compel the trial court to rule on his motion to correct sentence. We denied the petition
on September 17, 2013. See In re Harper, No. 01-13-00676-CR, 2013 WL 5288786
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Sep. 17, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
publication).
2
Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX CODE. CRIM.
PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n. 8
(Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of
Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Because
Harper’s conviction became final on February 26, 2008, this is a final post-felony
conviction proceeding and we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. See Medina v.
State, No. 01-14-00117-CR, 2014 WL 1494304, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st
Dist.] April 15, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)
(dismissing appeals of final post-judgment felony proceedings for lack of
jurisdiction).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
3