Opinion

Colbert v. U.S. Marshal's Service

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Nov 29, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.4%

The opinion

FILED

NUV

UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT 2 9 2010

FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLvMBIA C‘€rk, u.s. D,~st,

Bankrup¢¢y Co"$§nd

ANTONIO COLBERT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) civil A@uon No. 10 - 9Ȣ> 3 ?>

)

U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of plaintiff’ s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint

will be dismissed.

Plaintiff accuses defendant of unspecified misconduct and, and he asserts that the

"problems persist and gotten very much out of hand!" Compl. at 2. Although plaintiff does not

demand "money or compensation," he "would like for this matter to be looked into, and properly

adressed [sic] to your security staff at the courthouse." Id.

The Court has reviewed plaintiff s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers. See Haz'nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 5 l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,

must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. l987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiffs complaint does not contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon

which the Court’s jurisdiction depends or a claim that plaintiff is entitled to the relief he seeks.

F or these reasons, the complaint will be dismissed for its failure to comply with Rule 8(a). An

Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

M%/

United Statés District Judge

DATE:

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.