Opinion

Ahmad Halim v. Baltimore City Board

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 25, 2014
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2313

AHMAD HALIM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ANDRES ALONSO; NEIL E. DUKE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (1:11-cv-02265-WMN)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad Halim, Appellant Pro Se. Randi Klein Hyatt, Darrell

Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ahmad Halim appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims of

age, religion, and national origin discrimination. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Halim

v. Balt. City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:11-cv-02265-WMN (D. Md.

Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.