Opinion

Gary R. Poling, on Behalf of J.T.P. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Jan 10, 2014
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Special Master Millman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12-399V

Filed: January 10, 2014

Not for Publication

*************************************

GARY R. POLING, on Behalf of J.T.P., *

*

Petitioner, *

* Damages decision based on stipulation;

v. * flu vaccine; Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic

* Purpura

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Anne C. Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.

Traci R. Patton, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On January 10, 2014, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle

this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner, on behalf of his son, alleges that J.T.P.

suffered injuries that were caused by his September 26, 2011 receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine.

He alleges that J.T.P. sustained the first symptom or manifestation of his injury within two weeks

of his immunization, developed Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (“ITP”) as sequela of this

injury, and experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Respondent

denies that flu vaccine caused J.T.P’s ITP and denies that J.T.P. experienced the residual effects of

1

Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

delete such material from public access.

any injury for more than six months. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter

informally.

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby

adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and

on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards:

a. a lump sum of $25,000.00. The award shall be in the form of a check for $25,000.00

made payable to petitioner as guardian/conservator of the estate of J.T.P., for the

benefit of J.T.P. No payments shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with

documentation establishing that he has been appointed as the guardian/conservator of

J.T.P.’s estate; and

b. a lump sum of $6,000.00, which amount represents compensation for past

unreimbursable expenses. The award shall be in the form of a check for $6,000.00

made payable to petitioner; and

c. an amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 in the

attached stipulation. The award shall be in the form of a check made payable to the

life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased.

The amounts set forth in paragraphs 8.a. and 8.b. represent compensation for all damages

that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) (2012). In the absence of a motion for

review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment

herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.