Opinion

Orlando Brown v. Richland County Sheriff's Dep't

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 27, 2014
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2224

ORLANDO BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior

District Judge. (3:12-cv-03062-MBS)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, Andrew

Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Brown v. Richland Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 3:12-cv-03062-MBS

(D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.