The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1642
BETTY W. HART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; MICHAEL R. ASHBY, SR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00794-JRS)
Submitted: November 13, 2013 Decided: December 4, 2013
Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David R. Simonsen, Jr., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
Yvonne Steenstra Gibney, Senior Assistant County Attorney,
Hanover, Virginia; William Woodul Tunner, THOMPSON MCMULLAN,
P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Betty W. Hart, who was previously employed by the
Hanover County School Board (“the Board”), filed a complaint
against the Board and its Director of Pupil Transportation,
Michael Ashby, asserting that her employment was terminated in
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-
219 (West 1998 & Supp. 2013). We previously affirmed the
district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss
Hart’s complaint, but vacated the district court’s order denying
Hart’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to vacate, and her Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a) motion to amend her complaint. On remand, the
district court denied Hart’s motion to amend her complaint, and
denied her Rule 59(e) motion. Hart timely appealed.
We have reviewed the record and considered the
parties’ arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s final order. Hart v. Hanover
County Sch. Bd., No. 3:10-cv-00794-JRS (E.D. Va. May 2, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2