employer accelerates move to new site because workers vote for union recognition and request bargaining
How later courts described this case
- employer accelerates move to new site because workers vote for union recognition and request bargaining
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PER CURIAM.
We deny in open court the petition to set aside the order of the National Labor Relations Board, 135 N.L.R.B. 87 , which found that the petitioners had committed unfair labor practices in violation of Section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 , by unlawfully interrogating employees concerning their attitude and activities with respect to the union and by threatening them with economic reprisal, and for violating Sections 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act in discriminatorily discharging certain employees in its assembly and shipping department at Oxford, New Jersey. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings of the Trial Exam
*879
iner and the decision of the Board and we find the order of the Board, which directed that the employees be made whole for any losses which they may have suffered by reason of their discharge prior to April 30, 1961, to be an appropriate remedy.
Accordingly we deny the petition to review the order of the Board and grant the cross-petition of the Board for enforcement of its order.