Opinion

MATTER OF LARSEN v. Canary

65 N.Y.2d 634
65 N.Y. 634
491 N.Y.S.2d 159
480 N.E.2d 747
1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14708

Court: New York Court of Appeals
Filed: May 16, 1985
Status: Published
Cited by: 36 cases
Authority: More cited than 95.0%

Distinguished

Distinguished by Alessio v. Carey, 10 N.Y.3d 751 (2008)
We disagree with the Appellate Division’s conclusion that our decisions in Testa v Ravitz (84 NY2d 893 [1994]) and Matter of Larsen v Canary (107 AD2d 809 [1985], affd for the reasons stated below 65 NY2d 634 [1985]) control here.
New York Court of AppealsFeb 15, 2008Read it

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 107 AD2d 809 ).

(See also, Matter of Corrigan v Board of Elections,

38 AD2d 825 ,

affd

30 NY2d 603 .)

*636

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.