Opinion

Budget Dress Corp. v. Joint Board Of Dress And Waistmakers' Union Of Greater New York

  • 299 F.2d 936
  • 49 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2798
  • 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5714
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Filed
Mar 9, 1962
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.6%

The opinion

299 F.2d 936

BUDGET DRESS CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOINT BOARD OF DRESS AND WAISTMAKERS' UNION OF GREATER NEW YORK and Its Constituent Locals, and Charles S. Zimmerman, Nathaniel M. Minkoff and Leon Namenwirth, individually and as General Manager, Secretary-Treasurer and President, respectively, of the Joint Board of Dress and Waistmakers' Union of Greater New York; The International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO; and The Popular Priced Dress Manufacturers' Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 217.

Docket 27221.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued February 23, 1962.

Decided March 9, 1962.

Appeal from summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Sylvester J. Ryan, Chief Judge. Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing its action to recover monies allegedly paid in violation of the Labor Management Relations Act.

Morris J. Fellner, New York City (Fellner & Rovins, New York City, on brief), for appellant.

Emil Schlesinger, New York City (Schlesinger & Bloom, New York City, on brief), for appellees Joint Board et al. (Morris P. Glushien, New York City, on brief), for appellee ILGWU (Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon, New York City, on brief), for appellee, Popular Association.

Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellant seeks to recover monies paid into certain health, welfare and retirement funds on the grounds the payments violated section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 186 . On the basis of Minkoff v. Scranton Frocks, Inc., D.C., 181 F.Supp. 542 , aff'd per curiam 279 F.2d 115 (2 Cir. 1960) and the opinion of Chief Judge Ryan in the present case insofar as it deals with the merits of appellant's claim under Section 302, we affirm, 198 F.Supp. 4 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.