Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

  • 610 Pa. 1
  • 17 A.3d 917
  • 2011 Pa. LEXIS 847
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 6, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 89.6%

The opinion

*2

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2011 the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court err by holding that, in a petition to suspend compensation benefits based upon an alleged voluntary withdrawal from the workforce, the employer bears the burden of showing by the totality of the circumstances that the claimant has chosen not to return to the workforce?

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.