certifying questions and conflict with Flores
How later courts described this case
- certifying questions and conflict with Flores
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PER CURIAM.
We sua sponte consolidate appeals 4D10-3965 and 4D10-3966, and we affirm the denial of both motions for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
See Flores v. State,
57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). This decision expressly and directly conflicts with
Hernandez v. State,
61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (certifying questions and conflict with
Flores).
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.